Ensuring that the global climate and atmosphere is not further damaged with irreversible
consequences for future generations requires political will and concerted efforts by the international
community in accordance with the principles enshrined in the United Nations Framework
Convention on Climate Change. Under the Convention, some first steps have been taken to deal
with the global problem of climate change. Despite the adoption of the Convention, the emission
and concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) continue to rise, even as scientific evidence
assembled by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and other relevant bodies
continues to diminish the uncertainties and points ever more strongly to the severe risk of global
climate change. So far, insufficient progress has been made by many developed countries in
meeting their aim to return GHG emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000. It is recognized as one
critical element of the Berlin Mandate19 that the commitments under article 4, paragraph 2 (a) and
(b) of the Convention are inadequate and that therefore there is a need to strengthen these
commitments. It is most important that the Conference of Parties to the Convention, at its third
session, to be held at Kyoto, Japan later in 1997, adopt a protocol or other legal instrument that
fully encompasses the Berlin Mandate. The Geneva Ministerial Declaration20 which was noted
without formal adoption, but which received majority support among ministers and other heads of
delegation attending the second session of the Conference of the Parties, also called for, inter alia,
the acceleration of negotiations on the text of a legally binding protocol or other legal instrument.
At the nineteenth special session of the General Assembly, the international community
confirmed
its recognition of the problem of climate change as one of the biggest challenges facing the world in
the next century. The leaders of many countries underlined the importance of this in their
addresses to the Assembly, and outlined the actions they have in hand both in their own countries
and internationally to respond.
The ultimate goal which all countries share is to achieve stabilization of greenhouse
gas
concentrations in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic
interference with the climate system. This requires efficient and cost-effective policies and
measures that will be sufficient to result in a significant reduction in emissions. At this session,
countries reviewed the state of preparations for the third session of the Conference of Parties of the
Framework Convention of Climate Change in Kyoto. All are agreed that it is vital that there should
be a satisfactory result.
The positions of many countries for these negotiations are still evolving, and it
was agreed that it
would not be appropriate to seek to predetermine the results, although useful interactions on
evolving positions took place.
There is already widespread but not universal agreement that it will be necessary
to consider
legally binding, meaningful, realistic and equitable targets for annex I countries that will result
in
significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions within specified time frames, such as 2005,
2010 and 2020. In addition to establishing targets, there is also widespread agreement that it will
be necessary to consider ways and means for achieving them and to take into account the
economic, adverse environmental and other effects of such response measures on all countries,
particularly developing countries.
International cooperation in the implementation of chapter 9 of Agenda 21, in particular
in the
transfer of technology to and capacity-building in developing countries, is also essential to promote
the effective implementation of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
There is also a need to strengthen systematic observational networks to identify the
possible onset
and distribution of climate change and assess potential impacts, particularly at the regional level.
The ozone layer continues to be severely depleted and the Montreal Protoco needs to
be
strengthened. The Copenhagen Amendment to the Protocol needs to be ratified. The recent
successful conclusion of the replenishment negotiations of the Montreal Protocol Multilateral Fund
is welcomed. This has made available funds for, among other things, earlier phase-out of ozone-
depleting substances, including methyl bromide, in developing countries. Future replenishment
should also be adequate to ensure timely implementation of the Montreal Protocol. An increased
focus on capacity-building programmes in developing countries within multilateral funds is also
needed, as well as the implementation of effective measures against illegal trade in ozone-depleting
substances.
Rising levels of transboundary air pollution should be countered, including through
appropriate
regional cooperation to reduce pollution levels.