The idea of creating an international movement
for protecting sites in other countries emerged after World War
I.
The Convention concerning the Protection of the
World Cultural and Natural Heritage developed from the merging of
two separate movements: the first focusing on dangers to cultural
sites, and the other dealing with conservation of nature.
Preserving cultural heritage
The event which aroused particular international
concern was the decision to build the Aswan High Dam in Egypt,
which would flood the valley containing the Abu Simbel temples, a
treasure of ancient Egyptian civilization. In 1959, after an appeal
from the governments of Egypt and Sudan, UNESCO decided to launch
an international campaign. Archaeological research in the areas to
be flooded was accelerated. Above all, the Abu Simbel and Philae
temples were dismantled, moved to dry ground and reassembled.
The campaign cost about US$ 80 million, half of
which was donated by some 50 countries, showing the importance of
nations' shared responsibility in conserving outstanding cultural
sites. Its success led to other safeguarding campaigns, such as
Venice in Italy, Moenjodaro in Pakistan and Borobodur in Indonesia
to name but a few.
Consequently, UNESCO initiated, with the help of
the International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS), the
preparation of a draft convention on the protection of cultural
heritage.
Bringing cultural and natural heritage
together
The idea of combining conservation of cultural
sites with those of nature comes from the United States. A White
House Conference in Washington, D.C., in 1965 called for a "World
Heritage Trust" that would stimulate international cooperation to
protect "the world's superb natural and scenic areas and historic
sites for the present and the future of the entire world
citizenry". In 1968 the International Union for Conservation of
Nature (IUCN) developed similar proposals for its members. These
proposals were presented to the 1972 United Nations conference on
Human Environment in Stockholm.
Eventually, a single text was agreed upon by all
parties concerned. The Convention Concerning the Protection of
World Cultural and Natural Heritage was adopted by the General
Conference of UNESCO on 16 November 1972.
By regarding heritage as both cultural and
natural, the Convention reminds us of the ways in which people
interact with nature, and of the fundamental need to preserve the
balance between the two.
The most significant feature of the World
Heritage Convention is to link together in a single document the
concepts of nature conservation and the preservation of cultural
sites. Nature and culture are complementary and cultural identity
is strongly related to the natural environment in which it
develops.
What the Convention contains
The Convention defines the kind of natural or
cultural sites which can be considered for inscription on the World
Heritage List, and sets out the duties of States Parties in
identifying potential sites and their role in protecting and
preserving them. By signing the Convention, each country pledges to
conserve not only the World Heritage sites situated on its
territory, but also to protect its national heritage.
The State Party is encouraged to integrate the
protection of the cultural and natural heritage into regional
planning programmes and adopt measures which give this heritage a
function in the day-to-day life of the community.
The Convention further describes the function of
the World Heritage Committee, how its members are elected and their
terms of office, and specifies the professional advisory bodies to
which it can turn for advice in selecting the sites to be
listed.
The Convention explains how the World Heritage
Fund is to be used and managed and under what conditions
international financial assistance may be provided.
How the Convention works
The application for a site to be inscribed in the
World Heritage List must come from the country itself. UNESCO makes
no recommendations for listing. The application has to include a
plan detailing how the site is managed and protected.
The World Heritage Committee meets once a year
and examines the nominations on the basis of technical evaluations.
These independent evaluations of proposed cultural and natural
sites are provided by two advisory bodies, the International
Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) and the World Conservation
Union (IUCN), respectively.
A third advisory body, the International Centre
for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural
Property (ICCROM), provides expert advice on restoring monuments
and organizes training courses.
Once a site is selected, its name and location
are placed on the World Heritage List.
The criteria for selection
To be included on the World Heritage List, sites
must satisfy the selection criteria. These criteria are explained
in the Operational Guidelines for the Implementation of the World
Heritage Convention which, besides the text of the Convention, is
the main working document on World Heritage. The criteria have been
revised regularly by the Committee to match the evolution of the
World Heritage concept itself.
Cultural properties should:
i. represent a masterpiece of human creative
genius; or
ii. exhibit an important interchange of human
values over a span of time or within a cultural area of the world,
on developments in architecture or technology, monumental arts,
town-planning or landscape design; or
iii. bear a unique or at least exceptional
testimony to a cultural tradition or to a civilization which is
living or has disappeared; or
- iv. be
an outstanding example of a type of building or architectural or
technological ensemble, or landscape which illustrates (a)
significant stage(s) in human history; or
- v. be an
outstanding example of a traditional human settlement or land-use
which is representative of a culture (or cultures), especially when
it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change;
or
- vi. be
directly or tangibly associated with events or living traditions,
with ideas or with beliefs, with artistic and literary works of
outstanding universal significance (a criterion applied only in
exceptional circumstances, and together with other criteria).
- Equally
important is the authenticity of the site and the way it is
protected and managed.
Natural properties should:
- i. be
outstanding examples representing major stages of earth's history,
including the record of life, significant on-going geological
processes in the development of land forms, or significant
geomorphic or physiographic features; or
- ii. be
outstanding examples representing significant on- going ecological
and biological processes in the evolution and development of
terrestrial, fresh water, coastal and marine ecosystems and
communities of plants and animals; or
- iii.
contain superlative natural phenomena or areas of exceptional
natural beauty and aesthetic importance; or
- iv.
contain the most important and significant natural habitats for
in-situ conservation of biological diversity, including those
containing threatened species of outstanding universal value from
the point of view of science or conservation.
- The
protection, management and integrity of the site are also important
considerations.
Mixed sites have both outstanding natural and
cultural values. Since 1992 significant interactions between people
and the natural environment have been recognized as cultural
landscapes.