Urban design
The current state of our cities and suburbs is cause for alarm. Fortunately, however,
movements in
some circles of contemporary urban design are stirring up new ideas to address some of these
problems. A solution known as "New Urbanism" promotes methods that work to meet the needs
of
modern urban societies without discarding ideals of the past. Its proponents advocate the
restructuring of public policy and development practices to support urban restoration, suburban
reconfiguration and nature conservation. They also believe that all elements of urban development
must address the issues of environment, economics, community and design, simultaneously. The
Congress for the New Urbanism states in its website:
"We stand for the restoration of existing urban centers and towns within
coherent metropolitan regions, the
reconfiguration of sprawling suburbs into communities of real neighborhoods and diverse districts, the
conservation of natural environments and the preservation of our built legacy....Streets and squares
should
be safe, comfortable, and interesting to the pedestrian. Properly configured, they encourage walking
and
enable neighbors to know each other and protect their communities....Cities and towns should be shaped
by
physically defined and universally accessible public spaces and community institutions; urban places
should
be framed by architecture and landscape design that celebrate local history, climate, ecology, and building
practice" (About CNU).
New Urbanism promotes the idea of building places that people want to live and work
in. I believe
that this approach will help restore beauty and community in our living spaces which will result in
a
greater sense of contentment for the individual and society as a whole.
An even greater hope remains in the restructuring the curriculums of our public schools
to stress
the importance of art and design training for our children.
Historical exemplar
Regarding the roots of spatial cohesion, history reminds us of the Medici family that
governed
Florence for several generations. They were well educated patrons of the arts and were
instrumental in the design of this breathtaking city during the Italian Renaissance. Lorenzo de
Medici sponsored schools that trained renowned artisans who created its magnificent cathedrals,
palaces and city squares that are now the admiration of the world.
There are those who feel that today, as then, art training should be given the same
priority as
science at all levels of education. Their belief is that a greater focus placed on art education will
help to create a new generation of competent architects, city planners, zoning board members,
developers, and politicians that will be less inclined to tolerate disheartening architecture and
thoughtless urban planning. A new generation of responsible adult decision makers will be
cultivated who value art and see its connection with life around them. They will have learned
lessons from the failures of the twentieth century and will hopefully, like the Medicis, encourage the
development of beautiful cities once again.
After the successful termination of the war of Serezana, the Florentines lived in
prosperous
tranquillity until the death of Lorenzo de' Medici in 1492; for after having established peace by his
good judgment and authority, Lorenzo devoted his attention to the aggrandisement of the city and
of his own family. He married his eldest son Piero, to Alfonsina, daughter of the Cavaliere Orsini,
and had his second son promoted to the dignity of cardinal, which was the more remarkable as it
was unprecedented, the youth having hardly completed his thirteenth year.
This was in fact a ladder by means of which his house was enabled to mount to heaven
itself, as
indeed it happened in the course of time. He could not provide equally good fortune for his third
son, as he was still too young when Lorenzo died. Of his daughters, one was married to Jacopo
Salviati, another to Francesco Cibo, and a third to Piero Ridolfi; but the fourth, who, by way of
keeping the family united, had been married to Giovanni de' Medici, her cousin, died. In his
commercial affairs, however, Lorenzo was very unfortunate; for through the irregularity of his agents,
who managed his affairs, not like those of a private individual, but of a prince, the greater part of
his
private fortune was consumed; so that he was obliged to call upon his country to aid him with large
sums of money. In consequence of this he gave up all commercial operations, and turned his
attention to landed property, as being a more safe and solid wealth. He acquired large possessions
in the districts of Prato and Pisa, and in the Val di Pesa, and erected upon them useful and elegant
buildings, not like a private citizen, but with truly royal magnificence.
After that he directed his attention to extending and embellishing the city of Florence,
in which
there was still much vacant land. Here he had new streets laid out and built up with houses,
whereby the city was greatly enlarged and beautified. And to secure greater quiet and security
within the state, and to be able to resist and combat its enemies at a greater distance from the
city, he fortified the castle of Firenzuola, in the mountains towards Bologna; in the direction of
Siena he began the restoration of the Poggio Imperiale, which he fortified in the most complete
manner. Towards Genoa he closed the road to the enemy by the acquisition of Pietrasanta and
Serezana. Besides this, he maintained his friends the Baglioni in Perugia with subsidies and
pensions, and the same with the Vitelli in Citta di Castello; and in Faenza he kept a special
governor; all of which measures served as strong bulwarks to the city of Florence.
David Mayernik in his book 'Timeless Cities', considers four great and famous Italian
cities--Rome,
Venice, Florence, and Siena as models of a "usable past," as resources for the better construction
of future cities. It is a plea for the revival of humane urbanism. "We have the paradox today,"
Mayernik argues, "of being a generally more equitable society than, say, 14th-century Siena, but
we have built for ourselves a far less humane environment." Cities such as Siena, Mayernik writes,
"are still accessible to us, and they often strike visitors as oddly familiar, more like home than
home itself."