Urban design
The current state of our cities and suburbs is
cause for alarm. Fortunately, however, movements in some circles of
contemporary urban design are stirring up new ideas to address some
of these problems. A solution known as "New Urbanism" promotes
methods that work to meet the needs of modern urban societies
without discarding ideals of the past. Its proponents advocate the
restructuring of public policy and development practices to support
urban restoration, suburban reconfiguration and nature
conservation. They also believe that all elements of urban
development must address the issues of environment, economics,
community and design, simultaneously. The
Congress for the New
Urbanism states in its website:
"We stand for the
restoration of existing urban centers and towns within coherent
metropolitan regions, the reconfiguration of sprawling suburbs into
communities of real neighborhoods and diverse districts, the
conservation of natural environments and the preservation of our
built legacy....Streets and squares should be safe, comfortable,
and interesting to the pedestrian. Properly configured, they
encourage walking and enable neighbors to know each other and
protect their communities....Cities and towns should be shaped by
physically defined and universally accessible public spaces and
community institutions; urban places should be framed by
architecture and landscape design that celebrate local history,
climate, ecology, and building practice" (About
CNU).
New Urbanism promotes the idea of building places
that people want to live and work in. I believe that this approach
will help restore beauty and community in our living spaces which
will result in a greater sense of contentment for the individual
and society as a whole.
An even greater hope remains in the restructuring
the curriculums of our public schools to stress the importance of
art and design training for our children.
Historical exemplar
Regarding the roots of spatial cohesion, history
reminds us of the Medici family that governed Florence for several
generations. They were well educated patrons of the arts and were
instrumental in the design of this breathtaking city during the
Italian Renaissance. Lorenzo de Medici sponsored schools that
trained renowned artisans who created its magnificent cathedrals,
palaces and city squares that are now the admiration of the
world.
There are those who feel that today, as then, art
training should be given the same priority as science at all levels
of education. Their belief is that a greater focus placed on
art education will help to create a new generation of competent
architects, city planners, zoning board members, developers, and
politicians that will be less inclined to tolerate disheartening
architecture and thoughtless urban planning. A new generation of
responsible adult decision makers will be cultivated who value art
and see its connection with life around them. They will have
learned lessons from the failures of the twentieth century and will
hopefully, like the Medicis, encourage the development of beautiful
cities once again.
After the successful termination of the war of
Serezana, the Florentines lived in prosperous tranquillity until
the death of Lorenzo de' Medici in 1492; for after having
established peace by his good judgment and authority, Lorenzo
devoted his attention to the aggrandisement of the city and of his
own family. He married his eldest son Piero, to Alfonsina, daughter
of the Cavaliere Orsini, and had his second son promoted to the
dignity of cardinal, which was the more remarkable as it was
unprecedented, the youth having hardly completed his thirteenth
year.
This was in fact a ladder by means of which his
house was enabled to mount to heaven itself, as indeed it happened
in the course of time. He could not provide equally good fortune
for his third son, as he was still too young when Lorenzo died. Of
his daughters, one was married to Jacopo Salviati, another to
Francesco Cibo, and a third to Piero Ridolfi; but the fourth, who,
by way of keeping the family united, had been married to Giovanni
de' Medici, her cousin, died. In his commercial affairs, however,
Lorenzo was very unfortunate; for through the irregularity of his
agents, who managed his affairs, not like those of a private
individual, but of a prince, the greater part of his private
fortune was consumed; so that he was obliged to call upon his
country to aid him with large sums of money. In consequence of this
he gave up all commercial operations, and turned his attention to
landed property, as being a more safe and solid wealth. He acquired
large possessions in the districts of Prato and Pisa, and in the
Val di Pesa, and erected upon them useful and elegant buildings,
not like a private citizen, but with truly royal
magnificence.
After that he directed his attention to extending
and embellishing the city of Florence, in which there was still
much vacant land. Here he had new streets laid out and built up
with houses, whereby the city was greatly enlarged and beautified.
And to secure greater quiet and security within the state, and to
be able to resist and combat its enemies at a greater distance from
the city, he fortified the castle of Firenzuola, in the mountains
towards Bologna; in the direction of Siena he began the restoration
of the Poggio Imperiale, which he fortified in the most complete
manner. Towards Genoa he closed the road to the enemy by the
acquisition of Pietrasanta and Serezana. Besides this, he
maintained his friends the Baglioni in Perugia with subsidies and
pensions, and the same with the Vitelli in Citta di Castello; and
in Faenza he kept a special governor; all of which measures served
as strong bulwarks to the city of Florence.
David Mayernik in his book 'Timeless Cities',
considers four great and famous Italian cities--Rome, Venice,
Florence, and Siena as models of a "usable past," as resources for
the better construction of future cities. It is a plea for the
revival of humane urbanism. "We have the paradox today," Mayernik
argues, "of being a generally more equitable society than, say,
14th-century Siena, but we have built for ourselves a far less
humane environment." Cities such as Siena, Mayernik writes, "are
still accessible to us, and they often strike visitors as oddly
familiar, more like home than home itself."