Sarcophagus; late 3rd-early 4th cent AD Rome
The Europe animal sacrifice
ended with the establishment of Christianity; and
nothing could show more vividly the absolute newness of the Christian religion than
the choice of its symbolic animal. After the lions and bulls of Mithras and
Mesopotamia came the lamb and the sheep. Innocent, gentle and docile, they are
either the symbol of sacrifice, or exist to follow the will of the Good Shepherd, and to
enjoy His protection. In the same spirit the dove takes the place of the eagle or
falcon. Although the lamb is alluded to as a symbol of Christian humility in early
Christian texts, it does not appear in art till it can safely be substituted for the
hermetic fish. The sheep are the chief symbolic animals of the evolved Christianity of
the late fifth century, and inhabit the mosaics of Ravenna, beginning with the beautiful
representation of the Good Shepherd in the so-called Mausoleum of Galla Placidia.
Just when Christians
began to use and to create pictorial art is therefore not settled.
There are a number of images which fall on the cusp between the Christians' using
images which they acquired from pagan culture and their creation of images as 'their
own.' The first collection of Christian iconic art is in the emetery of S. Callistus
(Callixtus) from which there are funereal decorations (frescoes) which were painted
approximately at the end of the second century. This development took place at
about the same time as the early Christian apologists were writing. Both were a sign
that a hitherto small, poor and loosely organized group, that is, the Christians, began
to go public. The paintings in the catacomb, including their decorations (borders,
birds, fish, and so on), demonstrate a group who were employing the basic funereal
nature iconography of paganism and beginning to Christianize it. A chief element in
this development was the fact that Christians had begun to arrive at a period in their
growth when they were (1) organized enough to plan for such a project, and (2) had
the economic means to purchase the land and to pay for the excavation and
decoration of the cemetery.
Several of the 'Shepherd
Oil Lamps' can be acceptably dated in the period of
175—225 CE. It is not only on lamps of the late second and early third centuries that
the Good Shepherd appears. In Rome, the shepherds carrying their sheep began to
appear around 260 in relief sculpture . . . commissioned by the new religionists.
Within the literary culture of the new religionists there existed a long-standing
etradition that associated the founder of the movement with shepherding metaphors.
Here we find iconic representations that can be positively identified as produced by a
Christian aesthetic.
The Good Shepherd was
the most popular figurative Jesus image in the very
beginnings of Christian iconic art. It is is the criophorus (literally, the ram-
carrier). The figure is usually of a young man. beautiful and, most often, a
beardless youth; he is dressed for outdoor work, that is. with a short tunic and
boots or high-laced sandals; he stands carrying a sheep across his shoulders. It
is well known that the image of the ram-carrier was originally pagan and was at
least a thousand years old before it was used by the Christians. Hermes, Apollo
and Dionysos were all represented by the ram-carrier.
The metaphor of the
shepherd who cares for his flock is prolific throughout the
early church's literature (and not only in John 10 and Luke 15:3—7). The image
did not carry over to the church only in the traditions it received from ancient
Israel (as in Psalm 23); the shepherd as leader of the flock permeates the
Greek and Roman cultures of the Mediterranean basin from before the times of
the Odyssey. It is not therefore the rarity of the image which gives rise to
considerable and often contentious discussions about early Christians' use of
the iconic bonus pastor, the case is just the opposite. The image is employed
so often and is so permeated with a pagan scent that it seems the Christian use
of these images had to be justified in some way by art historians and
theologians.17
The most common device
in art history's canonization of the Good Shepherd
has been to suggest that it is an 'abbreviated representation,' and the image
therefote points to scriptural passages, namely, Luke 15:3—7 and John 10. The
broader presentation of a sheep carrier with his flock introduces a bucolic
theme, which, in this context, is to be understood as a symbolic reference to
John 10:II.'
The Christian apocrypha
join virtually the whole corpus of early Christian
literature in their employment of references to Jesus as Shepherd. The Acts of
Thomas 39 uses the phrase 'Good Shepherd' (agathos poimen). That the
Shepherd of Hermas uses the image is self-evident in the title given that work; it
is an especially relevant image in the fourth vision. The list of passages
throughout Christian literature is vast, and in the rhetorical images it is not only
Jesus who is the shepherd. God and the apostles are also shepherds of the
flock. In the latter reference, the phrase in the Acts of Paul and Thecla21 is
poignant and touching: Thecla, having been condemned to be burned, 'as a
lamb in the wilderness looks around for the shepherd, so Thecla kept searching
for Paul. And having looked into the crowd she saw the Lord sitting in the
likeness of Paul and said, "As if I were unable to endure, Paul has come to look
after me.'"