Guidance notes for
management derived from research findings: from Adrian Fowles, CCW
Senior Invertebrate Ecologist, CCW (Fowles 2004):
Research on the marsh fritillary suggests that
the species requires a minimum area of suitable habitat on a
metapopulation site to be viable in the long term.
On rhos pasture habitats, marsh fritillary
larvae will only feed on devil's-bit scabious; the abundance of
this food-plant is directly related to the survival of larvae.
Sward height also affects survival. Very short swards are
unsuitable as they provide no refuge for larvae in cold wet
weather. Tall rank swards are also unsuitable because they do not
support vigorous populations of the larval food-plant, devil's-bit
scabious, and they do not provide basking opportunities for larvae.
All larvae must bask in the sun to raise body temperature to allow
feeding activity.
Sward structure and status of the larval
food-plant in defining types of habitat quality:
Definition of Good Condition marsh fritillary
habitat: Grassland with Molinia abundant where, for at least 80% of
sampling points, the vegetation height is within the range of
10-20cm. cm (when measured using a Borman's disc) and Succisa
pratensis is present within a 1 m radius. Scrub (>0.5 metres
tall) covers no more than 10% of area.
Definition of Suitable marshy grassland: Stands
of grassland where Succisa pratensis is present at lower
frequencies but still widely distributed (>5% of sampling
points) throughout the habitat patch and in which scrub (>0.5
metres tall) covers no more than 25% of area. Alternatively,
Succisa may be present at high density in close-cropped swards.
Available habitat' is defined as the total of good condition and
suitable habitat.
There is very
limited habitat in the landscape surrounding Rhos Llawrcwrt and the
nearest occupied marsh fritillary site is approximately 7 km
distant. There are a few former rhos pasture sites on neighbouring
farms which have potential for reversion, but all these sites are
small. CCW owns land adjacent to the SAC which is currently
improved pasture but which has some potential for reversion to rhos
pasture. However, reversion management will take many years and the
focus for management must be on maximising marsh fritillary habitat
on the SAC.
The definitions for
'good' and 'suitable' habitat may be used at Rhos Llawrcwrt with a
single modification. Sward data collected from the parts of the
site which have supported a strong population of the butterfly
historically indicate that a sward with a height range of between
12 and 25 em is more appropriate. The definition of good condition
habitat becomes:
Grassland where for
at least 80% of sample points the vegetation is within the range
12-25 em and Succisa is present within a 1 m radius. Scrub >0.5m
tall cover no more than 5% of the area.
Factor
1:
Extent and distribution of marsh fritillary
habitat
Upper limit: not required
Lower limit: Within the SAC boundary:
26 ha of available habitat (the likely
distribution is c 9 ha in the core compartments, c 12 ha in the
low-density compartments and c 5 ha in the compartments for
reversion)', including 10 ha of good condition
habitat.
Factor 2 : Quality
of marsh fritillary habitat Upper limit: not required
Lower limit: 50% of the marsh fritillary habitat
within compartments 5 and 6 is
described as 'good condition habitat with dense
Succisa'
And
50% of the marsh fritillary habitat within
compartment 14 is described as good condition
And
Scrub covers less than 10% of compartment
15
Attributes and
limits
Population
size:
This is the only attribute that may be used as a
performance indicator tor this species. Other attributes of
quality, such as productivity and sex ratio, are difficult and time
consuming to measure. In relation to determination of population
size, it is most appropriate to consider the larval stage. Eggs are
difficult to find and. for this reason alone, abundance cannot be
systematically evaluated. Data collected on adult butterflies
cannot always be relied on to indicate population size because of
observer difficulties related to the mobility of the butterflies.
The abundance of larval webs will therefore be considered as the
sole attribute for this species.
Abundance of larval
webs:
Larvae feed communally in webs, which are easily
observed and reasonably static. Historically, a large amount of
sample data on webs ha^ been collected from a series of 53
transects in the current 'core' area for the butterfly on site -
compartments 8, 5, 6, 7 and 10. Data has been analysed annually and
an 'index' calculated which represents the total number of webs on
all transects observed in any one year. In order to allow
comparison with historical data, the performance indicators will
include reference to the annual index collected on the 53
transects.
In addition, the performance indicators must take
account of web abundance elsewhere on site, namely compartments 2,
3,4, 12 and 14, which have historically been occupied at low
density, and compartments 16 and 18, which are currently
semi-improved grassland but have potential for
reversion.
Because of the host/parasite relationship with the
wasp, the marsh fritillary population fluctuates significantly over
time. Historical data from the site indicate that there is
approximately a 10-year cycle between population peaks. If the
butterfly population were not being affected adversely by other
factors, it should be relatively high for half of that
period.
The following site-specific performance indicator
has been devised:
Attribute:
Larval webs
Upper limit: not
required
Lower limit: over any 10-year
period:
The web index count will be greater than 50 for at
least 5 of the years,
and annually:
• Larval webs continue to be present in all
management compartments
• A minimum total of 50 webs are present in
compartments 12 and 14
• A minimum total of 50 webs are present in
compartments 16, 18, 22 and 24
Annual data on adult
abundance will be collected as a surveillance project. Although
adult data is not as reliable as larval data, it may still be used
to confirm that any annual cohort of larvae are successfully
producing adult butterflies and that there is a direct relationship
between trends in the abundance of larvae and adults.
Status of marsh fritillary: unfavourable
recovering (Wilkinson 2005)
The 2005 revision of Favourable Conservation
Status meant that, for the first time since 1992, the status of the
feature was deemed to be unfavourable. This is because there is
insufficient 'good' and 'suitable' habitat on the NNR at present.
However, there is potential to increase the area of both categories
of habitat through reversion of the improved pastures on the NNR
and achieve Favourable Conservation Status in the
future.