There are three sorts of flows of creativity which we find especially closely related
to change in our
cultural images that influence attitudes to place. For the most part, these create internal
landscapes within us, which influence our behaviours to, and within, particular places. Many of
these moments of creativity are concerned with recognising the present in the past.
One is scientific discovery, with or without consequences in technology; for science
is by definition
concerned with introducing change into 'right' knowledge. In some forms it does this by simply
adding, or extending, a habitual approach; in others, by bringing about a 'revolution' and opening out
whole new avenues for further advance. Our day to day world is evidence of this and we define
progress as solving problems in such a way as to enable further problems to be faced and in their
turn solved.
Another category is the expressive arts. Artists, in this context means painters,
musicians,
sculptors, poets, dramatists, architects, and so on, shading off into those concerned with the
applied arts, dress design, media copy- writing, etc.) The expressive arts captures and objectifies
values and attitudes, collective perceptions and dreams and intimations, often with peculiar
precision. Sometimes artists do this to order, sometimes not; occasionally they convey more than
they intend; but at their best they convey the very latest state of feeling, even when they are not
out
to announce it. It is not by accident that the word 'culture' is often narrowed down to refer to their
business of producing expressive objects, the symbols or distillations of much more broadly-
spreading patterns of value. By their nature artists are more or less fated to reflect change,
and in
modern European societies it is expected that they should herald it, anticipate it and be prophets,
seers, scouts of the future.
From prehistoric times 35,000 years ago, artists have expressed values of environment
and these
values, which came into existence to encapsulate feelings about a particular place, hold important
positions in our heritage. However, the images of animals upon, which the local survival of
Palaeolithic hunters depended, initially enter the imagination as artistic reproductions of the actual
places and images. This highlights a generalism, that our values of environment seldom come from
actual contact with places that are, or were, real. For most people they are selected either from
visual contact with a painting, or more likely, a photograph, and increasingly from a video or holiday
brochure. Values about where to go and what to protect are carried by collections of visual icons
about particular places.
A third stream of ideas about environment comes from the recent political development
of
ecologism.