Materialism is a system of philosophical thought that explains the nature of the world
as entirely
dependent on matter. As a rational cultural movement it has had intermittant success in
influencing the course of human social development starting as early as the 4th century BC, when
the Greek Democritus set out his system of atomism in which all phenomena are explained
by sub-
visual particles and their motions in otherwise empty space. Epicurus and the Stoics also
conceived of reality as material in its nature. For the next millennium or so Christianity ensured
the
dominance of transcendental thought about matter and its divine origins, and European materialism
did not emerge as a strong social force again until the 17th century when Thomas Hobbes took the
position that consciousness essentially belongs to the physiological world of the senses. The
culminating expression of materialism came in 18th century France with the 'Systeme de la nature'
of Baron d'Holbach.
Throughout history, materialism has always gained ground at times of scientific advance
and this is
particularly evident in Victorian Britain when prominent scientists clashed repeatedly with religious
orthodoxy. A good example of this conflict is John Tyndall's confrontation with the religious
establishment who he regarded as promoting anti- intellectual and anti-scientific tenets. The public
clash came in 1874 when he gave the Presidential Address to the British Association for the
Advancement of Science in Belfast. Tyndall was a self- educated physicist who climbed to the top
of the European scientific establishment and was a member of a Royal Society presssure group
promoting the adoption of a national scientific education system, a group which included Thomas
Henry Huxley and Michael Faraday. His Belfast lecture was denounced from the pulpits and
pamphlets attacking its content continued to appear for years afterwards.
As a European polymath, among his friends Tyndall numbered Louis Pasteur, Thomas
Carlyle and
Alfred Tennyson. The latter was deeply disturbed by the difficulties he had in making a personal
adjustment to a universe in which the great designer-God of his childhood was being replaced by a
'force of nature' with no interest in the ultimate fate of humanity. His poems reflect this dilemma.
They include exquisite descriptions of natural history alongside others expressing despair at the
inhumanity of man who is part of a process of evolution that is blind to humanity's greatest
intellectual achievements. His lifelong efforts to provide a personal religion for reconciling science
and religion did not produce any novel philosophy, but his poems remain timeless expressions of
the utterences of 'thinking man' who wants desparately to fit into a greater scheme of things.